top of page

When it comes to the art of reading music, there are a handful of things that the learner may stumble over. What note belongs to which clef? What is a crotchet vs. a minim? What do they both look like and what do they both mean?


But none seem to be as confusing as the old time signature marking that comes at the very beginning of the music (just after the clef and - if marked - key).



Time Signature Jack Mitchell Smith Piano Congleton


A typical time signature marking looks like this:



Time Signature


And upon asking pupils what it means, they will correctly identify that it is, indeed, 4 beats in a bar…


However…


When asked to be a bit more specific, things get a bit muddled. Not only that, when I do explain in my admittedly extravagant and lavish way, it can often leave them feeling a little bit more befuddled than they felt before.


So, let’s dissect a time signature so that we can have even more understanding of this branch of music theory and better improve your piano skills!



What Are the Numbers?



The example above is of a 4/4 time signature, also called common time signature (because 4 beats in a bar is extremely commonly used!).


So if there are 4 beats in a bar, why on earth does it double up on the number 4?


Surely it just needs to tell me once how many beats are in a bar, yes?


Not quite…


The number of beats in a bar is defined by our top number.


The bottom number tells us something else: it tells us what kind of beats we’re looking at!


4 at the bottom tells us they are crotchets, so there are 4 (as per the top number) crotchets (as per the bottom number) in a bar!



Time Signature


But why? Why? Why? How can I remember this?


Well, here’s two useful techniques:



Accept It!



Not meaning to sound brutal, but if you haven’t already clocked on to the fact that music has lots of things that ‘just are’, welcome to music theory!


And if you learn that 4/4 = 4 crotchets specifically, then decoding time signatures moving forward will just naturally be a whole host easier!



The Fraction Method



If you are really looking for an outlet to help you remember, however, this is an instance whereby the American names of our notes comes in super useful!



1/2 Beat: Quaver = Eighth Note

1 Beat: Crotchet = Quarter Note

2 Beats: Minim = Half Note

4 Beats: Semibreve = Whole Note



Time Signature


How would you read 4/4 as a fraction?


Four quarters, ergo 4 quarter notes i.e. 4 crotchets!



Using Technique to Decode Further Time Signatures



There’s really no rules as to what you can do with time signatures, providing that the bottom number is, in fact, a recognised value of note (so start with 1 and keep doubling it: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, even 64 technically! - any of these etc.).


The top number just tells you how many there are!


But there are certainly standards that we adhere to:



2/4 = 2 crotchets in a bar. Marches are frequently in 2/4.


3/4 = 3 crotchets in a bar. Waltzes are in 3/4 time.



But wait…let’s have a look at a couple of common examples whereby the lower number is not a four.


6/8 = 6 ‘beats’ in a bar.


12/8 = 12 ‘beats’ in a bar.


But what beats are they?…


You can use either method here to work it out.


If you’d just accepted that 4/4 = 4 crotchets, then you know that 4 = a crotchet as far as time signatures are concerned. When we double the number at the bottom, we half the existing value of the note. Our number has doubled to 8, so we half the value of a crotchet. This makes a quaver. Thus, 6 quavers in a bar for 6/8, 12 quavers in a bar for 12/8.


Alternatively, just use the American phraseology! 6/8 = 6 eighth notes. 6 quavers. Done!



BUT WHY????????



Be careful about reading too deeply into this if you are brand new to key signatures because I know what you’re thinking…why?! And I will explain some of the logic, however if you’ve only been dealing with 4/4 (and maybe other /4 time signatures, this might not fully click yet and that’s OK!)


Why do we need to establish what the beats are? Surely we can just write the number 4 at the beginning and say that’s how many beats are in the bar?



Answer Number One: Tempo



This one on its own would not provide a concise enough explanation and would, in fact, be quite debatable alone. Because ultimately, you could just write number 4 at the beginning of your bar and write different tempo markings on it depending on how fast or slow you wanted those beats played.


However, if you wish to play a piece of music quicker then it makes sense to use quavers rather than crotchets. Quicker still? Make them semiquavers!


The reason this point alone is quite debatable is because strictly speaking, neither of the following are wrong and would yield practically identical results in terms of rhythm and tempo:



Time Signature

Time Signature


But the second one would be more desirable as not only would it would allow for better phrasing (see the following point - division) and also would provide a more suitable, steady beat. If you set the metronome to the first time, your ears would get tired and frustrated at the relentlessness of that beat!



Answer Number Two: Division



Here is where we start to solidify our need to have what type of notes explicitly stated. We’ve briefly touched on tempo. Now let’s look at division.


In the two example of ‘Baa Baa Black Sheep’ above, by establishing that the second arrangement is in 4/4 time, we can account for the fact anything less than a crotchet (as established by the bottom number) should be given secondary importance if not falling on the main beat.


In other words, the crotchet counts of 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 should be well punctuated, but notes such as the quavers that fall between these beats on the second bar (B and A respectively) shouldn’t be.


In the first example, we haven’t marked a time signature anyway, but even if we put a perfectly respectable 4/4 time signature at the front, it wouldn’t work quite the same way. Each crotchet in the second bar would be given that same punctuated beat as it demands a slightly different interpretation.



Answer Number Three: Simple vs. Compound



This follows on from division, really, but is basically a way to immediately mark out how the pulse of a piece should sound.


Simple Time: These are our top numbers being 2, 3 and 4.


Compound Time: These are our top numbers being 6, 8 and 12.


So to use a straightforward and relatively common example, we can differentiate between a simple time such as 3/4 and a compound time such as 6/8 (which appear to be the same thing, mathematically speaking!) using the following breakdown:


Simple Time: The top number is literally how many ‘main’ beats there are!


Compound Time: Our ‘main’ beats are dotted 😱


Panic not, however, as I know that you all know what a dot does to a note (or beat); it increased it by half!


So if we take 6/8 as our compound time and see what we could squeeze into it as dotted beats, we could fit in 1 x a dotted minim (worth six quavers, but a terrible idea because it doesn’t really help to divide the bar and distinguish between 3/4 and 6/8!) OR 2 x dotted crotchets (now we’re talking!).


So 6/8 is divided into 2 ‘main’ beats.


So the difference in 3/4 and 6/8 in terms of how the flow of the pulse sounds if this:


3/4: 1 and 2 and 3 and


6/8: 1 and a 2 and a


In 3/4, your 6 quavers would be marked in three groups of two to ensure that the first of each group (well…pair) corresponds with the crotchet beat.


In 6/8, your 6 quavers are 2 groups of 3! :



Time Signature



Answer Number Four: Time Change



When you start advancing in your music, you will start to realise that it isn’t common - especially with more modern music - to stick to one time signature!


The problem with not establishing your type of notes at the bottom of a time signature would be you wouldn’t know what kind of beats you were counting, meaning you might involuntarily speed up or slow down!


Because I’ve been thinking about it a lot at the moment, the musical / opera ‘Morella’ (for which yours truly has composed the music - watch this space!) is literally littered with time signature changes.


And for your eyes only, here’s a sneak peek of a tiny section of the piano and vocal score!:



Time Signature


The first bar (109) is a continuation of it being in 4/4, although I’m sure you could work that out from the types of notes and rhythm in the bar. Then we have a bar of 2/4, then 4/4, then three bars of 6/8, then back to 4/4!


Needless to say, whatever speed you count time signatures with the same lower number remains the same. So for the 4/4 to 2/4 to 4/4 transition, you would count a steady “1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 1 - 2 - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4”, but by going into 6/8 we know now we need to count the beats twice as fast as they are no longer crotchets - they are quavers! To get used to it, you could count the quavers throughout the whole thing at the same tempo: “1 and 2 and 3 and 4 and 1 and 2 and 1 and 2 and 3 and 4 and 1 and a 2 and a 1 and a 2 and a 1 and a 2 and a 1 and 2 and 3 and 4 and…”, but the point is it keeps it exactly locked into the composer’s desired pulse and tempo.



In Conclusion: Understanding Time Signature and Learning Music Theory to Improve Your Piano Playing



I hope this post has been of some help to you! Remember that time signature is there to help. As I always say, all the information you need to know about a piece (or at least, to start a piece!) is right there at the beginning in clef, key and time, so make sure you’re very familiar with how it works and get yourself into the habit of checking it before you commit to playing!



 

Jack Mitchell Smith is a piano teacher based in Congleton, Cheshire. Click here to find out more.


Weekly blogs are posted that may help you with your musical or piano journey. Click here to sign up to the mailing list so you never miss a post!


 

One little pastime I have when I’m not playing or practising piano is reading, and this is perhaps true of many people.


And speaking from the perspective of a teacher / blog writer, it’s always nice to read a book that you can potentially apply to the mindset to better teach your subject. It may even help you yourself to learn!


Recently I finished a book that did just that.


Was it a book that delved into piano - or even just music - as an art form, or perhaps explored the life of the pedagogue? Maybe an inspirational historical account of how music helped people overcome a difficult period in times gone by?


No. No. And no.


It may surprise you that the book I recently finished was…


Jurassic Park’.


Yes - you did in fact read that correctly!



Chaos Theory Piano Practice


A book about genetically engineering dinosaurs with the intention of showing them off to the public in a big theme park and it all going horribly wrong!


Do you see the connection yet between the two things - piano and dinosaurs?


No!


It actually took me a while to make the connection, but actually the novel delves into something that I was relatively unfamiliar with (being self admittedly ‘artistically’ minded, less ‘academically’) : CHAOS THEORY!



What is Chaos Theory?



In a nutshell, Chaos Theory deals with the sheer vulnerability and delicacy of any system - no matter how well designed - and its likelihood of falling apart in drastic ways as a result of one or more extremely small factor(s).


One quote from the book reads:


The idea of a perfect system is a fantasy. In reality, even the most well-designed systems will eventually break down due to unforeseen circumstances”.


Obviously in the book this is referring to carefully planned and monitored genetic engineering along with carefully controlled and monitored safety protocols in order to maintain the desired output: healthy, live dinosaurs in a controlled and safe environment.


But, I hear you cry, what about music? Why on earth is this relevant?


Let’s explore!



Chaos Theory Whilst Playing Piano!



Let’s take what we have just read about Chaos Theory and reapply it to our practice and performance:


“The idea of a perfect piano performance is fantasy. In reality, even the most well practiced / rehearsed pieces will eventually break down due to unconsidered circumstances”.


Obviously this isn’t to say that you won’t be playing perfect performances some of the time, but for years I’ve been sat here at the piano racking my brains as to why I can play it perfectly one day and then come to it later the next day only for it to fall apart before my very eyes.


To further quote from the source novel:


Chaos Theory says that even the tiniest change can have massive consequences. Like a butterfly flapping its wings in Brazil can cause a hurricane in Texas”.


Obviously a butterfly in your back garden will (probably!) not cause a dud note or a meltdown during your playing, but the point is that we focus on one thing and one thing alone when we learn a piece of music and that is:


Can I play it?


And if we happen to be able to play it then we give ourselves a pat on the back and very conclusively answer:


Yes!


However we need to be asking a slightly bigger question:


Why can I play it now?


And now we consider everything that goes towards making your performance work. We’ll take the knowledge and the general skill as written, but why is it that you may return to it in a week or even in an hour and play it not half as well?


Let’s start with the BIG THINGS!



The Big Things!



Your Instrument



It’s so obvious to say, but if you have a piano of your own then you will probably play your piano better than you play anyone else’s piano in the world! If you have a keyboard, you’ll probably be more comfortable playing keyboards than piano (and vice versa). And this isn’t even just a dynamic thing. Having a pattern engraved on a piano may distract you on an older piano if your piano is a more modern type. Even a different colour can have a big effect! This is why I always encourage pupils to try playing as many different pianos as possible, and if you are taking lessons then try and minimise home visits and make the effort to go to your teacher’s house / studio (even if only once in a while) to get a new feel.



Your Seat



This one all boils down to comfort, of course. And this is partly to do with the type of seat and its padding etc., but also to do with height. Fortunately, piano stools are infinitely more portable than the piano itself so if you were to consider playing on a different one you could take a stool if you thought for whatever reason they wouldn’t have one. However, make sure you know exactly the height you need to readjust to as this all plays a part.



Your Environment



Simply put, if you play piano in your living or dining room then it’s a familiar surrounding and that will fill you with a sense of comfort. Not to mention that you will also get used to things around the room. If you have a picture on the wall to your left or in front of you as you play, we can sometimes get lost in the picture whilst doing so, and having that lack of reference point can be a surprisingly difficult situation to content with. So that is to say, if you were to go and play on someone else’s piano, you have three things different to contend with: the piano itself, the stool (most likely) and the room. But there’s one more big thing:



Your Obligation / Lack of



If you are playing at home then the chances are you are either practicing - which is perhaps a little tedious but routine - or you’re doing so for pleasure. It’s like a win win. If you’re playing literally anywhere else then you will likely be doing so not just with those first three points thrown in to cause a major change, but doing so with reason. It will almost certainly be more a performance, even if it’s just you with a friend who said “hey - play us a song on my new piano!”. Now, there’s an added complexity - more of a mental complexity - to your playing as you need to perform!



And there was your refresher course in some very big differences that you may come across whilst playing and practising piano.


However, this talk about Chaos Theory got me thinking about why I can play exactly the same thing in exactly the same environment. On a Monday morning, wake up and play a simple piece of music great! On a Tuesday morning, wake up and play the same piece dreadfully.


Why?


That, fellow Chaoticians, is where we must explore the Little Things



The Little Things!



Time of Day



Typically I will practice in a morning, and one thing that is interesting is that I’ve noticed that I’m slightly more of a morning person when it comes to playing and practising. Therefore, my best output is in the morning! So there’s a little clue as to why it might be different if I play the same piece later on in the day…but wait! There’s more…



Sleep



This, of course, ties into the time of day in as much as yes I may be generally better in a morning, but if I’ve not slept as much then I’ll not play as well. As well as my hands being physically more lethargic, I’m not going to have the same mental stamina to get through a piece. Sounds obvious? Wait, however…there’s even more!



Repertoire



What have I just played? If I had eight hours sleep on a Sunday and a Monday night, got up at the same time, did everything the same and then played the same piece of music at the same piece of time but both times following on from a different warm up then the results might be drastic. If I’m doing something that is a slightly more ‘mindless’ warm up (i.e. those that are well engrained into muscle memory e.g. scales) then I might continue playing on from those much better than if I move onto a brand new warm up exercise the following day and engage my brain for 10 minutes trying to work on some new finger positioning for a new Hanon technique. That will take more of a mental strain and because it’s not yet muscle memory, it will get my fingers a little more strained than the previous day’s warm up.



Seating Position



This isn’t related to height now, but is to do with where you sit across the keyboard. Theoretically you should always begin in front of Middle C, but how close are you to that each separate time? Remember our tiny variation discussion from earlier? If you sit just a couple of centimetres to your left compared to last time you played a piece, your right hand and arm will have to compensate that distance with a touch more a stretch and your left arm will have to compress slightly. You won’t feel a massive difference in comfort, but these are the little things that may have an effect.



And that just takes us onto the butterflies! These are the things that seem completely unrelated because they are completely separate from your efforts when at the piano, but are things you should always bear in mind…



The Butterflies



Temperature



Obviously a highly advanced, virtuosic concert / competition pianist may constantly be adjusting the temperature to get an all round skill when it comes to playing come all climes, but if you’re learning a piece of music then just take note of what temperature it is that works well for you. Take note also of when it doesn’t work well and try to keep yourself within the lows and highs of your limit.



Diet



This isn’t a plea for healthy eating although I suppose I should legally say I don’t recommend you eat an unhealthy diet (and that’s not for piano, that’s generally!) but consider what - if anything - you have eaten that day when you do a good vs. a bad performance. In addition, take into account how much you ate, how full you were when you finished and how long has passed since you did finish. In such a way as I don’t have to imply you need to change your diet, try to work your piano practice sessions around your food habits as best as possible - and this may be entirely personal, so there’s no right or wrong way here!



Work and Leisure (including Exercise)



Aside from the mental strain of coming home from work and forcing yourself to practice (never a good idea!), work can have its own issues as can a fair amount of other hobbies such as cooking, DIY, video games, the gym etc.; they take their toll physically.


Light hobbies like reading (the very hobby that triggered this blog post, in fact) won’t fall into this as such, but things that involve lots of typing, writing or other handy work - especially if there’s heaviness involved - will have varying degrees of impact when it comes to playing. Take note of how your hands feel and how comfortable your posture is when sitting at the piano and try to identify if there is anything you could relate it to that you have done. Take note as to how soon after a task you start and stop aching and how severely vs. what you have just done. If you do play anything on piano, can you play things at the speed you’d like or does everything lag? Similarly to the whole discussion on diet, these are things that will affect different people in different ways, so try to make it work for you.



In Conclusion



So, with my new mindset of ‘Musical Chaotician’ well and truly defined (not really - but it sounds good!), I have reached the conclusion that there is even more at play against you than even I had  accounted for. Obviously, you will never recreate every single scenario like for like, but keeping consistency and identifying the weak points is a potentially great place to start in helping you be consistent with your playing and practice!


No doubt I’ve missed several factors that can all play into your performance going awry - big and small - so feel free to comment your own additions down below!



 

Jack Mitchell Smith is a piano teacher based in Congleton, Cheshire. Click here to find out more.


Weekly blogs are posted that may help you with your musical or piano journey. Click here to sign up to the mailing list so you never miss a post!


 

A few months ago (by which I mean over a year), I published this blog post to update you all on the fact that I was orchestrating my piano and vocal score of music set to Blake’s poetry works: ‘Songs of Innocence’ and ‘Songs of Experience’.


Despite the fact that I finished orchestrating it well over a year ago (not all that long after the blog was published, in fact!), I sat on it for a very long time as a result of things such as moving house, focussing more on teaching etc. - but thanks to the wonder of Black Friday I found an offer I couldn’t refuse to help me progress this;


The company EastWest do a subscription to what they call ‘ComposerCloud’. This is all of their virtual instruments and effects for a couple of hundred pounds for an annual subscription, yet Black Friday saw a 50% reduction (£120). Now, I’m not made of money, but that’s a whole lot cheaper than spending hundreds on real instrumentalists and recording space etc. (although, tragically, that is the state of the modern music industry: computers rule, real musicians are becoming all the less valid - from the financial business perspective, of course).


So I downloaded this on Black Friday and forgot about it thanks to getting welcomely waylaid by getting engaged and then Christmas and New Year etc.


And I have taken the first steps in creating backing tracks for when (if) I ever welcome vocalists onto the project (of course this is the plan!)…


Using the example of ‘The Little Vagabond’ (because I do enjoy that one!), here is a screenshot of the orchestration from Presonus software ‘Notion’:



Songs of Innocence Songs of Experience William Blake Jack Mitchell Smith Piano Composer


From which I have to export the file as a MIDI file. And this is where the magic happens as this is uploaded into Apple’s ‘Logic Pro X’ - the all round studio software in which you can record audio, but at present I am using it as a sequencer.


A sequencer is a very fancy software that allows you input notes as data rather than sound and then play around with them. Think about the holes on a piano roll for the old pianolas and you’ve kind of got the first idea: the sound isn’t stored on the paper, the data is stored on it. You just load it an it plays it.


With this in mind, each individual note can be shortened, lengthened, increased or decreased in volume and - most importantly - assigned its own sound. Obviously, tracks stick together, so the flute part stays all on one track which overall makes it easy because if you find a good flute sound it just assigns it to the whole track…but if you wanted to have some notes a bit more ‘stabby’ or some a bit more slow on the attack then its fair to say EastWest have gone the extra mile by giving you samples of just about every instrument (orchestral, pop / rock, drums, pianos, synths, even vocals!) being played in all sorts of ways!


Here is how ‘The Little Vagabond’ is currently looking in Logic Pro X:



Songs of Innocence Songs of Experience William Blake Jack Mitchell Smith Piano Composer


And to say I am blown away by the results is a slight understatement, somewhat!


Here are some samples of various pieces.


Bear in mind that I have not even scratched the surface yet - I have just assigned default sounds.


Also, because the MIDI data was input into a computer rather than played, the velocity of all notes is unnaturally IDENTICAL! I have not tweaked this yet, so all instruments are kind of doing their thing at the same volume all the way through.


I have used a default EastWest Spaces reverb effect for a little depth which remains to be tweaked, but just listen to the overall realism of the sounds here!:



Eyes peeled for more updates!



 

Jack Mitchell Smith is a piano teacher based in Congleton, Cheshire. Click here to find out more.


Weekly blogs are posted that may help you with your musical or piano journey. Click here to sign up to the mailing list so you never miss a post!


 
bottom of page